Fontainebleau Miami Beach Hotel Sues Rabbi Shmuley Boteach for Defamation and Claims “Extortion”
The recent lawsuit filed by the Fontainebleau Miami Beach Hotel against Rabbi Shmuley Boteach has captured significant attention, revealing a complex narrative of alleged extortion, defamation, and social media warfare. This unfolding drama highlights the intersection of celebrity, social media influence, and legal accountability in an era of increased tension on numerous fronts, particularly when it comes to places of public accommodation popular in the Jewish community, such as is the case with the iconic Fontainebleau Miami.
Background of the Dispute
The conflict in question erupted on December 1-2, 2024, when Rabbi Boteach was allegedly โloitering in the hotel lobby for over an hourโ before engaging in a verbal altercation with a guest. This incident marked the beginning of a series of events that would escalate into serious legal allegations against the rabbi. According to the hotelโs complaint, Boteachโs actions โwere not merely spontaneous but part of a calculated campaign against the establishment.โ
In contrast to the hotelโs framing, Rabbi Boteach, in an opinion piece for the Jerusalem Post a mere few days after the incident, stated the following:
โI felt like I was in Berlin in 1936, a feeling reinforced when security finally came over and treated me, the victim, as if I were equally responsible for the situation and ended up actually hugging the โFree Palestineโฆโ screaming Islamist attacker, even as he continued to openly threaten me with violence.โ
Rabbi Boteachโs Description of Incident
In a follow-up comment after the lawsuit was filed, Rabbi Boteach expressed his frustration and anger with the hotelโs lawsuit and stated that the hotel:
โโฆhad already lied to me 18 months earlier in a similar near-lethal attack at his hotel, that he would retrain his security to protect at-risk-Jewish guests with yarmulkes or Magen Davids, ignored me completely, which led me to report the hate crime to the police and the FBI, who are currently investigating. The ADL condemned the attack as an antisemitic hate crime in the strongest possible terms.โ
The reference to โ18 months earlierโ stems from a prior incident at the hotel involving Rabbi Boteach. The complaint states in reference to the earlier incident that Rabbi Boteach โโฆdemanded personal lifetime access to the swimming pool and gym at the Hotel (the same place he says is unsafe). Ultimately, Defendant Boteach accepted a free dinner at the Hotel and moved on.โ
Allegations of Defamation and Harassment
The lawsuit outlines numerous claims against Boteach, describing his behavior as a โshakedown.โ The complaint details how he allegedly produced AI-generated videos that misrepresented hotel staff as antisemitic and compared them to Nazi collaborators. Such actions were characterized as defamatory and damaging not only to the hotelโs reputation but also to its business relationships. The complaint begins with:
โIn every context imaginable, reasonable people would call the actions of Defendant Jacob Shmuel Botachโฆ a โshakedown.โโ
Boteach is accused of fabricating statements that suggested the hotel embraced a policy of Judenrein, or ethnic cleansing, which is particularly inflammatory given the historical context. He is also alleged to have threatened a hotel lawyer, claiming they were โtraitorsโ to their people and warning them that they had โno idea whatโs in store for them.โ
Extortion Claims
The lawsuit further alleges that Boteach attempted to extort the hotel for financial gain, for amounts ranging from $100 million to a $1 million donation to his organization, the World Values Network, in exchange for ceasing his campaign against the hotel. The complaint notes:
โNow heโs back again, with a promise to โde-escalateโ his campaign of harassment in exchange for a $1 million โdonationโ.โ
According to the complaint, the alleged extortion was accompanied by threats of organizing a โGIANT RALLYโ against the hotel, purportedly aimed at combating antisemitism. However, the complaint alleges that Boteach used this rally as leverage in his negotiations with the hotel.
Data from ProPublica on a 2019 IRS filing reveals that out of $1.59 million in contributions to the World Values Network, Boteach and his wife received nearly $555,000 in compensation (Rabbi Boteach was compensated $394,999, and Deborah Boteach, Rabbi Boteachโs wife, was compensated $160,000) โover 34% of total contributions.
The complaint seems to insinuate that any โdonationโ would inevitably benefit Rabbi Boteach and states:
โDefendant Boteach is out to pad his bank account no matter if it means spewing falsehoods to burn well-earned good reputations.โ
Boteach Claims Lawsuit โReads Like a Photocopy of the Protocols of the Elders of Zionโ
In response to claims of extortion, Rabbi Boteach stated that the Jewish owner of the Fontainebleau, Jeffrey Soffer, โjoined the ranks of arch-antisemites David Duke, Candace Owens, and Antonio Guterrez of the UN in saying Jews are responsible for antisemitism rather than its victims.โ He further stated that โSofferโs fraudulent lawsuit reads like a photocopy of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, accusing Jews of being money-grubbing shakedown artists who incite and fabricate antisemitism for cash.โ
Boteach has leveraged his substantial social media following to amplify his grievances against the Fontainebleau. His posts feature content aimed at discrediting hotel staff and management. The complaint emphasizes and alleges that Boteachโs online presence has been used not just for advocacy but as a weapon against those he perceives as adversaries:
โAt all hours of the day and night, Defendant Boteach proceeded to harass the Hotel and its representatives.โ
Rabbi Boteachโs Public Persona
This latest dispute is an addition to Rabbi Boteachโs increased public persona and immense attention gained for his appearances on Piers Morganโs YouTube show since October 7th, where he discussed the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict. His performances have elicited mixed reviews; some view him as an ardent supporter of Israel whose advocacy has a net positive effect, while others criticize his aggressive tactics and involvement with novelty items as counterproductive. Also, this is not the only lawsuit Rabbi Boteach has been the target of afterย Candace Owens recently filed aย suit against him.
Legal Implications
The Fontainebleau seeks not only damages but also punitive measures against Boteach. They are pursuing an order for uncapped punitive damages and a restraining order to prevent further harassment. The complaint asserts:
โDefendant Boteachโs conduct is malicious and illegalโฆ He has engaged in extortion against the Hotel.โ
Rabbi Boteach is represented by renowned criminal defense attorney Ben Brafman, while the Fontainebleau Miami is represented by Sean Burstyn of Burstyn Law, who Rabbi Boteach alleged is a โJew for hire.โ